- 相關(guān)推薦
油膩的飲食英語(yǔ)作文
A Diet Rich
In this argument ,the arguer concludes that a diet rich in dairy products may increase,instead of decreasing the risk of osteoporosis,alluding that we should limit the consume of such products for health's sake,To support this conclusion, the arguer cites the result of a study that those who have consisitantly consumed dairy products are more vulnerable than others to bone fracture,and fracture is a symptom of osteoporosis,hence more vulnerable to osteoporosis.It seems reasonable at first glance,a close examination with it ,however,will reveal several inherent flaws of it. In the first place, the argument is based on a gratituous assumption that osteoporosis equals bone fracture, which is unwarrented.As we know; there may be alternative reasons such as sports and traffic accidents that cause bone fracture. Unless a convincing survey with the reasons of bone fractures of the inpiduals involved in the study is proposed that all fractures are caused by osteoporosis,the study will lend little support to the argument for its own representiveness is suspected. In addition, the arguer fails to takes into saccount the age, hobby and other relevent background of the inpiduals who participated the study.It is not just diary products that matter.It's possible, even probably, that those who like mounting as well as diary products.It's obvious that those climbers are more vulnerable to bone fracture, how can we owe the fracture to the diary products that he ate in the morning? Finally,the arguer ignores other factors such as genes,surroundings and habits that may have some bearings on osteoporosis,To trace the causes of osteoporosis to any single reason is to be miss the wood for the trees. To sum up, the argument is unconvincing due to several reasons state above .To Stength the argument, the arguer should estabish a causal relation beteween osteoporosis and bone fracture, to make the argument more cogent, the arguer should initiate a survey with those people to determine that if the diary products are the genuine reason for fracture.Unless the arguer do these, the argument is not acceptable.
在這場(chǎng)爭(zhēng)論中，arguer認(rèn)為，飲食中含有豐富的乳制品可能增加，而不是減少骨質(zhì)疏松癥的風(fēng)險(xiǎn)，暗指我們應(yīng)該限制消費(fèi)類產(chǎn)品的健康的緣故，支持這一結(jié)論，arguer引用的結(jié)果的研究，那些誰(shuí)堅(jiān)持認(rèn)為食用奶制品的更容易受到比其他骨折，骨折是骨質(zhì)疏松癥的癥狀之一，因此更容易患骨質(zhì)疏松癥。它似乎合理乍一看，仔細(xì)檢查它，然而，將揭示一些固有的缺點(diǎn)。首先，爭(zhēng)論是基礎(chǔ)上gratituous假設(shè)，骨質(zhì)疏松癥等于骨骨折，這是unwarrented。正如我們所知道的；有可能被替代的原因，如體育和交通事故，導(dǎo)致骨折。除非提出，所有骨折引起的骨質(zhì)疏松癥，研究將借一點(diǎn)支持自己的代表性的論點(diǎn)令人信服的調(diào)查與骨折的研究中所涉及的個(gè)人原因是懷疑。此外，arguer未到需要為saccount年齡，愛(ài)好和其他相關(guān)背景的個(gè)人參加研究。它不只是奶制品，這件事。可能的話，甚至有可能，，那些誰(shuí)安裝以及乳制品。很明顯，那些登山者更易發(fā)生骨骨折，如何我們可以欠骨折日記產(chǎn)品，他吃早晨？最后，arguer忽略了其他因素，如基因，環(huán)境和習(xí)慣，可能會(huì)有一些軸承的骨質(zhì)疏松癥，微量的骨質(zhì)疏松癥的原因，任何單一的原因是被錯(cuò)過(guò)的樹木的木材。綜上所述，論證是不能令人信服的由于幾個(gè)原因以上的國(guó)家。退變性爭(zhēng)論，arguer應(yīng)該TMJOA的因果關(guān)系beteween骨質(zhì)疏松和骨折，使論證更有說(shuō)服力，arguer應(yīng)該發(fā)起一項(xiàng)調(diào)查，那些人確定，如果乳制品是斷裂的真正原因。除非arguer做這些，爭(zhēng)論是不可接受的。
【油膩的飲食英語(yǔ)作文】相關(guān)文章：
均衡飲食英語(yǔ)作文11-29
健康飲食中考英語(yǔ)作文12-09
衛(wèi)生健康飲食英語(yǔ)作文04-02
改變飲食的小學(xué)英語(yǔ)作文04-06
飲食文化英語(yǔ)作文（通用21篇）12-07
飲食高中作文11-30
從飲食看中國(guó)的作文04-02